muttersMutters

Usurious ecologically hostile finance system known as capitalism that is under threat.." From http://transitionurbanindia.ning.com/forum/topics/eliminating-usurious-and-debt

The aims outlined here for usury-free finance are noble and important, for the reasons given. My own view, to sharpen the statement:

Really this points to the recent financial 'collapse'. This 'collapse' is a collapse, but not in the way we are meant to understand it by the media, their owners, or the secret financial movers of governments worldwide. All this was foreseen, by insiders and by 'maverick' economists, as well as ordinary people. The usurious financial system is not under threat, but people ands their ownership is. It is a simple transfer of wealth from people to the usurious banks.

(more...)

US will have get its usurious debts written off along with the rest of countries while reducing the demand for energy intensive consumption, production and transport along with the rest of the world. US citizens should call for adoption of faith based measures for reducing the demand and it is the culture of prayer 5 times that they need to promote... Culture of irreverent leisure and pleasure propelled on the platform on energy intensive transport are not sustainable for any society as all of us need to prepare for peak oil . There is a need to adopt intercultural Islamic commons for moving on to the transition to a future that is ecologically safe for children across the lands. Bombs, drones, nuclear weapons, imbalance in trade are not sustainable. Please have a look at http://transitionurbanindia.ning.com and http://transitionus.ning.com for the discussions across the domain of food security, local currency, etc toward building self reliant communities. From http://www.rebelnews.org/opinion/americas/194275-us--china-provoking-the-creditor-hugging-the-holy-man-washingtons-road-to-ruin.

Good point. Of course, any form of true religion would help, as Ibn Arabi himself claimed.

The trouble Dr Muhammed, is that in spite of Cassius Clay, and a grudging admiration for some 'Islamic scientific achievement'. or a love of basmati rice and naan bread, in the west people are conditioned to dislike and distrust muslims. Above all, Political Correctness is important.

Interesting thesis, thought provoking. A particularly interesting idea is of the free-range-livestock:

It is essential to understand the reality of the world. When you look at a map of the world, you are not looking at countries, but farms. You are allowed certain liberties, limited property ownership, movement rights, freedom of association and occupation; not because your government approves of these rights in principle, since it constantly violates them, but rather because free-range-livestock is so much cheaper to own and is so much more productive. From http://www.rebelnews.org/opinion/americas/194452-illusions-of-freedom

This is a great analogy for how the relationship between government and populace now functions. Similar practice is seen now with camel herders and semi-wild herds. There are great differences though; A camel has a greater given dignity and trust, and is treated with more respect for its intelligence.

Marriage is a partnership for the prospect of children, for heterosexuals, not for love alone. Love doesn't have to be sex, nor does expression have to be through sex, haven't you heard?

I love my children, and don't have sex with them. Sex has to have fun or children as its aim, or its perverse (like an abnormal kind of sick anonymous hunter), surely? It doesn't have to have expression, it could be duty, it doesn't have to have love, perhaps it never can be love, because love is love, not sex. Sex is sex and means copulation or something like that. Love is a good, but useless as an idea without a heart. I recognise that sex, at first, naturally beckons feelings of love - but these feelings may soon be abandoned without faithfulness. You can be faithful without marriage, but marriage is a commitment for faithfulness for the sake of both, children and parents alike. An institution for family.
(more...)

For an excellent choice of email signatures use this online ascii generator.
It's a good idea to select the 'all fonts with your text' option, and then take your pick from the results.
The results wont display properly in html however, so I resorted to an image file for an illustration of the results in 'caligraphy' style.

"The Controversey of Zion" is a scholarly book written with first hand knowledge by Douglas Reed, a senior Times correspondent, but supressed from publication, first in America and now in Britain. Only if you read this book can you really comment on world affairs, as the public is kept unaware of the real detail in the issue of the links between Zionism and Communism and two world wars - World domination, misery and crushing of nation states. If you could be a patriot, read this first - available on the internet for reading. You will not be dissapointed.

Excerpt from: Chapter 40 The Controversy of Zion by DOUGLAS REED:

The Chicago Tribune in 1950 reported the view of a senior official of the State Department that the United States was ruled by “a secret government” consisting of three members of the deceased Mr. Roosevelt's circle: Mr. Henry Morgenthau junior, Justice Felix Frankfurter and Senator Herbert Lehman. The word “Jew” was not used; the article expressed the opinion of a high public servant on a matter held by him to be of great national importance. This article raised much commotion in the Zionist and Jewish press throughout the world (few non-Jewish newspapers paid attention to it, for the obvious reason). I was in South Africa but guessed what would follow and when I next went to America learned that I was right; the Tribune Tower in Chicago was besieged by the A.D.L. with peremptory demands for an apology. On this particular occasion none was made; the newspaper was at that time a lonely survivor from the days of independent reporting and comment. (A piquant detail; the writer of this “anti-semitic” report had interested himself, not long before, in efforts to obtain the release on parole of a Jew serving a life-term for murder, on the ground that expiation might reasonably be held to have been made).
(more...)

Excerpt from Chapter 37: The Controversy of Zion by DOUGLAS REED:

Mr. Roosevelt's presidency would be further to break down the principle stated, to alter “the basic strain,” and to enable “a foreign group” to dictate State policy.
  Mr. Roosevelt (like Mr. Wilson, Mr. Lloyd George and General Smuts) evidently was selected before he was elected. Mr. Howden says that Mr. House “picked Roosevelt as a natural candidate for the presidency long before any other responsible politician,” chose him as Assistant Secretary of the Navy in 1913, and then through the years groomed him for the presidency, expecting to govern through him, as through President Wilson. Then something went wrong. Mr. House was confident that President Roosevelt would call on him but then realized that “certain people don't want the president to listen to me.” These people were evidently too strong, for Mr. House was dropped without any courtesy and at this point (1933) disappears from the story.
(more...)

Excerpt from: The Controversy of Zion by DOUGLAS REED: Chapter 36

Mr. Winston Churchill in his memoirs rightly called the Second War “the unnecessary war.” It could have been prevented by firm Western opposition to Hitler's preliminary warlike forays (into the Rhineland, Austria and Czechoslovakia) at any time up to 1938 when (as Mr. Churchill also confirms) the German generals, about to overthrow Hitler, were themselves undone by the Western capitulation to him at Munich.
The trained observers in Berlin were agreed that he would make war if allowed and so advised their governmental or editorial superiors in London. The Chief Correspondent of The Times in Berlin, Mr. Norman Ebbutt (I was the second correspondent) reported early in 1933 that war must be expected in about five years unless it were forethwarted, and this particular report was printed. He, I and many other reporters during the following years grew alarmed and perplexed by the suppression, “burking” and ignoring of despatches, and by the depictment of Hitler, in Parliament and the newspapers, as an inherently good man who would remain peaceable if his just grievances were met (at others' expense).  

This period has become known as that of “the policy of appeasement” but encouragement is the truer word, and the policy changed the probability of war into certainty. The strain brought Mr. Ebbutt to physical collapse. From 1935 on I was Chief Correspondent in Vienna, which was then but another vantage-point for surveying the German scene. From there, late in 1937, I informed The Times that both Hitler and Goering had said that the war would begin “by the autumn of 1939”; I had this information from the Austrian Chancellor. I was in Vienna during Hitler's invasion and then, after brief arrest by Storm Troops on the way out, transferred to Budapest, where I was when the supreme capitulation of Munich followed in September 1938. Realizing then that a faithful reporter could do nothing against “the policy of appeasement,” and that his task was meaningless, I resigned by expostulant letter, and still have the editor's discursive acknowledgement.
Fourteen years later The Times publicly confessed error, in respect of its “policy of appeasement,” in that curiously candid Official History of 1952. This contains a grudging reference to me: “There were resignations from junior members of the staff” (I was forty-three in 1938, was Chief Correspondent for Central Europe and the Balkans, had worked for The Times for seventeen years, and I believe I was the only correspondent to resign).
(more...)

Excerpt from: Chapter 35 The Controversy of Zion by DOUGLAS REED:

As masses of Jews were openly opposed to Dr. Weizmann's Zionism, even he could not pretend that he spoke for them. Thus he transferred his canvassing from the antechambers of the Gentiles to the Jews and for eight years sped about the world in search of a solution to this problem, The great mass of emancipated Jews of the West resolutely opposed any project that might turn out to be one for the recreation of “a Jewish nation.”
(more...)

NB See dispute about quotes

PREFACE It is a rather serious matter to attack the reputation of a famous man, one who has posed and been accepted as one of the world's greatest scientists. For many years, Pasteur has been looked upon as a founder and leader in serology; but it is always pertinent to look into the beginnings of any subject on which there is a difference of opinion, with the hope of finding the truth in the matter.

The writer has made an effort in his prior books and pamphlets to show that the germ theory is false, and that illness was practically always due to errors of diet or manner of living, the germs being present solely as scavengers of dead and waste tissues and foods, and not as the cause of the disease.
(more...)

Try Scroogle's Search the web: Scroogle uses google search indexes, but filters out all information sent to track your surfing. Works brilliantly.